Tafvid qilingan hech bir yordamchi (vazir) ma'muriy muassasaning bo'limlaridan biriga alohida ixtisoslashmaydi, balki uning mas'uliyati umumiydir, chunki ma'muriy ishlarni olib boradigan kishilar xizmatchilar (davlat xizmatchilari) bo'lib, hokimlar emas, tafvid qilingan yordamchi esa hokimdir. U hech bir vazifada alohida vakolat bilan ishonib topshirilmaydi, chunki uning mas'uliyati umumiydir.

None of the delegated assistants (Tafwid) specialises in a specific department from the departments of the administrative institution, rather his responsibility is general, since those who undertake the administrative affairs are employees (civil servants) and not rulers, while the delegated assistant is a ruler. He is not entrusted with a specific authority in any of the tasks since his responsibility is general.

Dalil shuki, at-Tirmiziyning rivoyatidagi "mening ikki vazirim" so'zlaridan iboratki, yordamchi (muovin) Xalifaning Xilofatdagi yordamchisidir, ya'ni hukmronlikda; shuning uchun u hokimdir, xizmatchi emas. Shu sababli unga ma'muriy ishlarni bajarish joiz emas, chunki ular xizmatchilar tomonidan olib boriladi, hokimlar tomonidan emas. Yordamchi hokim bo'lib, xizmatchi emas, shuning uchun uning vazifasi ishlarni nazorat qilishdir, xodimlar uchun belgilangan, ularga haq to'lanadigan ishlarni bajarish emas. Demak, u ma'muriy ishlarni o'z zimmasiga olmasligi kerak. Bu uning har qanday ma'muriy ishni bajarishi harom ekanligini anglatmaydi, balki unga aniq ma'muriy ishni bajarish yuklatilmasligi kerak; aksincha, unda umumiy nazorat vakolati bor.

The proof is what is meant by the words “my two ministers” in the narration from Al-Tirmidhi, in that the assistant is the assistant to the Khalifah in the Khilafah - in other words, in ruling, and so he is a ruler and not a civil servant. For that reason, it is not permitted for him to deal with the administrative affairs since those are dealt with by civil servants and not by rulers. The assistant is a ruler and not a civil servant and so his work is taking care of the affairs and not to undertake work that employees are paid to do. Therefore, he should not undertake administrative affairs. This does not mean that it is forbidden for him to do any administrative work, rather that he should not be specified to do administrative work; rather he has general control.

Bu vakilning vakolati aniq qilib belgilanmagani sababli, chunki u yordamchidir va yordamchi umumiy vakillik hamda umumiy nazorat bo‘yicha vakolatga ega bo‘ladi. Shu sababli u Xalifa o‘zidan yordam so‘ragan har bir masala uchun yoki uni yuborgan har bir soha uchun yangi vakolatga muhtoj emas, chunki uning vakolati aniq emas edi. Aniq vakolat bilan vakolatlangan kishi esa, masalan, sud boshlig‘i, qo‘shin boshlig‘i, zakot ishlari bo‘yicha hokim va shunga o‘xshash aniq mas’uliyatni o‘z zimmasiga oladi; bunday kishiga u vakolatlangan har bir aniq sohada yangi vakolat berilishi talab qilinadi.

As for not specifying his empowerment, this is because he is an assistant, and the assistant is empowered in representation and general control. Due to this, he does not require a new empowerment for every issue that the Khalifah seeks his help in, or for any area he sends him to, since his empowerment was not specific. As for the one who is empowered with a specific empowerment, he would be holding a specific responsibility such as the head of the judiciary, the head of the Army, the governor over the charity and so on; and this would require a new empowerment in every specific authority they were charged with.