Muhtasibning o‘ziga o‘rinbosarlar tayinlash huquqi bor. Ular muhtasibning talablariga javob berishlari kerak, va u ularni turli joylarga tayinlashga haqli. Bu o‘rinbosarlar o‘zlariga topshirilgan hududlarda va ular vakolat berilgan holatlarda hisba vazifalarini bajarish vakolatiga ega bo‘ladilar.

The Muhtasib has the right to appoint deputies for him. They should fulfil the requirements of the Muhtasib, and he is allowed to assign them to different places. Those deputies would have the power to carry out the duties of the Hisbah in the areas to which they have been assigned, and in the cases for which they have been delegated.

Ushbu maqola Muhtasibni tayinlashda unga vakillarni, ya'ni boshqalarni tayinlash huquqi kiritilganmi, degan savol bilan cheklangan. Bu Xalifa tomonidan tayinlangan bo'lsa shunday. Agar tayinlov Oliy qozi tomonidan amalga oshirilgan bo'lsa, avvalo shu band tasdiqlanishi kerak. Bundan tashqari, Oliy qozining o'zi tayinlanishida unga o'z tayinlagan qozilarga boshqalarni o'rniga ishlatish, ya'ni ularga o'rinbosarlarga ega bo'lish huquqini berish vakolatini beruvchi band bo'lishi kerak. Agar Oliy qozida bunday vakolat bo'lmasa, u bunday vakolatni tasdiqlash huquqiga ega bo'lmaydi va shuning uchun Muhtasibga o'rinbosarlar bo'lishiga ruxsat berilmaydi; ya'ni u vakolat berish huquqiga ega bo'lmaydi. Qozining o'z nomidan vakolat berish huquqi, u Muhtasib, Qozi yoki Mazolim sudining qozisi bo'lishidan qat'i nazar, qozining o'z qo'lida emas, faqat Xalifa unga ruxsat bergan bo'lsa yoki qozilarni tayinlash va tayinlanganlarga vakolat berishga ruxsat berish huquqi Sud boshqaruvchisiga, ya'ni Oliy qozига berilgan bo'lsa shunday bo'ladi. Buning sababi shuki, qozi sud tizimiga, ya'ni aniq bir turdagi sud tizimiga, ya'ni Hisbaga tayinlanadi. Shuning uchun agar unga vakolat berish huquqi, ya'ni o'z o'rniga o'rinbosar tayinlash huquqi berilmagan bo'lsa, u hech kimni tayinlash uchun majburiy vakolatga ega bo'lmaydi. Bu Qozi va Mazolim sudi qozisiga ham taalluqlidir, chunki ularning har biri tayinlov bandiga ko'ra sud tizimiga tayinlanadi va tayinlov shartnomasida zikr qilinmagan bo'lsa, ularda boshqa vakolat, ya'ni qozilarni tayinlash vakolati yo'q. Shu sababli, bu shartnomaning bir qismi bo'lmasa, u Hisba vazifalarini o'z nomidan bajarish uchun o'rinbosar tayinlash huquqiga ega emas. Bu Oliy qozi uchun ham xuddi shunday.

This article is restricted by whether the appointment of the Muhtasib included the right to appoint delegates for him; or in other words, the right to appoint others. This is if he had been appointed by the Khalifah. However, if the appointment was made by the Supreme Judge, the clause must be approved first, and in addition to this, the appointment of the Supreme Judge must include a clause that gives him power to allow the judges that he appoints to delegate others to act on their behalf, in other words, to give them the right to have deputies. If the Supreme Judge did not have such power, then he would not be in a position to approve such delegation, thus the Muhtasib would not be allowed to have deputies; in other words, he would not have the right to delegate. The power of the judge to delegate on his behalf, whether it be the Muhtasib, the Qadi (judge) or the judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim), is not in the hands of the judge unless the Khalifah allows him to do so or if the permission to recruit judges and to allow those appointed to delegate were given to the Governor of the Judiciary, in other words, the Supreme Judge. This is because the judge is appointed to the judiciary, in other words, a specific type of judiciary, which is the Hisbah. Therefore, if he were not given the right to delegate, in other words, the right to appoint a deputy for himself, he would not then possess the mandatory power to appoint anyone. This applies to the Qadi and the judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim), for each of them would be appointed to the judiciary according to the appointment clause, and they do not possess any other power, in other words, they do not have the power to appoint judges unless it was mentioned in the contract of their appointment. For this reason, he does not have the right to appoint deputies to perform the duties of Hisbah on his behalf, unless this was part of his contract. The same applies to the Supreme Judge.

Vakillar tayinlashning joizligiga kelsak, bu sababli: Allohning Elchisi ﷺ biror ish ko'rib chiqilganda, o'zi o'rniga kimnidir vakil qilib tayinlagan. Shunga ko'ra, bir badaviy arab Allohning Elchisi ﷺ huzuriga kelib, o'g'li bir kishining yollanma ishchisi bo'lib ishlaganini, u esa o'sha kishining xotini bilan zino qilganini aytib, hukm so'raganida, Allohning Elchisi ﷺ o'sha voqeada shunday dedilar:

As for the permissibility of appointing deputies, this is because when the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) was presented with a case, he appointed someone as a delegate for himself. Accordingly, in the incident of the desert Arab who came to the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) and informed him that his son was working for a man and he committed adultery with the man’s wife and asked him for the verdict, the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said at that incident,.

«O Unais! Bu (erkak)ning xotiniga bor, agar u (zino qilganini) iqror bo‘lsa, uni toshbo‘ron qil». (Abu Hurayra va Zayd ibn Xolid rivoyat qilgan, ittifoq bilan sahih) Bu hadis qozi o‘zi belgilagan masalani hal qilish uchun o‘rniga vakil yuborishi mumkinligini ko‘rsatadi. Xuddi shunday, muhtasib ham qozi bo‘lgani uchun unga ushbu yo‘nalishda vakil tayinlashi mumkin. Biroq qozi o‘z noibiga ishning butunligi bilan shug‘ullanishga ruxsat berishi kerak; boshqacha aytganda, unga shikoyatni tekshirish va hukmni o‘zi chiqarish huquqi berilishi kerak, aks holda noiblikka tayinlash to‘g‘ri hisoblanmaydi. Buning sababi shuki, sudlov majburiy kuchga ega bo‘lgan hukmni yetkazishdir, shu sababli bu jihatdan uni bo‘lib bo‘lmaydi. Demak, qozi uni faqat tekshirish uchun, hukm chiqarmasdan tayinlay olmaydi, balki tayinlov to‘liq bo‘lishi kerak, shunda u qozi bo‘ladi va uning hukmi haqiqiy bo‘ladi. Agar u haqiqatda hukm chiqarmagan bo‘lsa ham, uning ishi to‘g‘ri bo‘ladi, chunki hukm chiqarish uning qozi sifatida harakat qilishining sharti emas. Qozi ishni ko‘rib chiqishi mumkin, ishini tugatib hukm chiqarishdan oldin lavozimidan ozod etilishi mumkin va shunda ish boshqa qozига topshiriladi, u hukm chiqaradi. Xuddi shu qoida qozining noibiga ham tegishli: hukm chiqarish uning sharti emas, lekin tayinlanganda tekshirish va hukm chiqarish huquqi berilishi kerak; ya’ni u to‘liq qozi sifatida, qoziga berilgan barcha majburiy vakolatlarga ega bo‘lib tayinlanishi lozim. Muhtasibga ham xuddi shu qoida taalluqli: agar unga noiblar tayinlash vakolati berilgan bo‘lsa, u belgilagan ishlarda yoki ularni joylashtirgan hududlarda tekshirish va hukm chiqarish huquqiga ega noiblar tayinlaydi. Qozi o'zining noiblari sifatida tayinlaydiganlarning shartlari quyidagilar: ular musulmon, ozod, adolatli, balog'atga yetgan bo'lishi hamda o'zi ko'rib chiqadigan masalalarda fiqh ilmiga ega bo'lishi kerak; boshqacha aytganda, muhtasibning noibi ham muhtasib bilan bir xil shartlarga ega, chunki ikkalasi ham qozidir.

.» وَاغْ دُ يَا أُنَ يْسُ - رجل من أسلم - إِلَى امْرَأَةِ هَذَا، فَإِنِ اعْ تَ رَفَتْ فَارْجُمْهَا «. “O Unais! Go to the wife of this (man) and if she confesses (that she has committed illegal sexual intercourse), then stone her to death.” (agreed upon from Abu Hurayrah and Zayd Bin Khalid), which indicates that the judge can send a delegate on his behalf to judge upon an issue that he has specified for him, and in the same way this can be for the Muhtasib since he is a judge. However, the judge must allow his deputy to deal with the case as a whole; in other words, he must be allowed to look into the complaint and pronounce judgement himself, if the appointment to deputise is to be considered valid. This is because the judiciary is the conveying of the rule which is then binding, so in this context it cannot be split, and ,therefore, he cannot appoint him to merely investigate without judging but rather the appointment must be complete so that he becomes a judge and his judgement becomes valid. Even if he did not actually pronounce a judgement, his work would be valid, since it is not a condition for him to act as a judge - a judge could look into a case, and before completing his work and pronouncing his judgement, he could be relieved of his duties, and then the case would be referred to another judge who would pass judgement. The same applies to the judge’s deputy - it is not a condition for him to pass judgement, but he must be given the right to investigate and pass judgement when appointed; in other words, he must be appointed as a full judge, holding all the mandatory powers given to a judge. The same applies to the Muhtasib - he appoints deputies with powers to investigate and judge in the cases he assigns for them, or in the areas in which he places them, if he has been given the power to appoint deputies. The conditions for those whom the judge appoints as his deputies are that they must be Muslim, free, just, adult and possessing knowledge of jurisprudence in the issues which he will be looking into; in other words, the deputy of the Muhtasib has the same conditions as the Muhtasib since they are both judges.