Muhtasib har qanday qoidabuzarlik haqida xabar topishi bilan, joyidan qat'i nazar, va sud majlisini o'tkazish zaruriyatisiz, bu qoidabuzarliklar bo'yicha hukm chiqarish vakolatiga ega. Uning buyruqlarini bajarish va hukmlarini darhol ijro etish uchun bir qator politsiyachilar uning ixtiyoriga beriladi.

The Muhtasib has the authority to judge upon violations as soon as he learns of them, irrespective of the location and without the need to hold a court session. A number of policemen are put at his disposal to carry out his orders and to execute his verdicts immediately.

Ushbu maqolada aniqlanishicha, muhtasib ishni ko'rib chiqishi uchun sud majlisi talab etilmaydi; u jinoyat sodir bo'lganiga ishonch hosil qilgan zahoti jazo haqida hukm chiqaradi va istalgan joyda, istalgan vaqtda hukm chiqarish huquqiga ega. Bu bozorda, uyda, hayvon ustida yoki mashinada yurganda, kunduzi yoki kechasi bo'lishidan qat'i nazar shunday. Sababi shuki, ishni hal qilish uchun sud majlisi zarurligini tasdiqlaydigan dalil muhtasibga nisbatan qo'llanmaydi, chunki bu shartni belgilagan rivoyat quyidagicha deydi:

This article clarifies that a judicial court would not be required for the Muhtasib to look into the case at hand, rather he passes the judgement upon the offence the moment he is sure that it took place, and he has the power to judge at any place and at anytime, whether in the market, in the house, while riding on the back of an animal or in the car, or during the day or night. This is because the evidence that confirms the need to have a judicial court in order to rule upon a case does not apply to the Muhtasib, because the narration which confirmed this condition states.

. » أَنَّ الْخَصْمَ يْنِ يَ قْعُدَانِ بَ يْنَ يَدَيِ الْحَكَمِ « .

. » أَنَّ الْخَصْمَ يْنِ يَ قْعُدَانِ بَ يْنَ يَدَيِ الْحَكَمِ « .

"ikki da'vogarning sudya oldida o'tirishi shart" va.

“that the two litigants have to sit in front of the judge” and.

. » إِذَا جَلَسَ إِلَيْكَ الْخَصْمَانِ « .

. » إِذَا جَلَسَ إِلَيْكَ الْخَصْمَانِ « .

“when the two litigants sit in front of you” (Ahmad Ali (ra) dan rivoyat qilgan). Bu holat Hisbah muhtasibi bilan bo‘lmaydi. Chunki bu yerda da’vogar ham, javobgar ham yo‘q, balki jamoat huquqi buzilgan yoki Shari‘at buyrug‘i buzilgan bo‘ladi. Shuningdek, Allohning Elchisi ﷺ taom uyumi haqidagi ishni ko‘rganlarida, u paytda bozorda yurar edilar va taom sotuvga qo‘yilgan edi. U sotuvchini o‘zlari oldiga chaqirmadilar, balki jinoyatni sezgan zahoti shu joyning o‘zida choralar ko‘rdilar. Bu shuni ko‘rsatadiki, Hisbah ishlari sud majlisini talab qilmaydi.

“when the two litigants sit in front of you” (reported by Ahmad from Ali (ra)). This situation does not exist with the judge of the Hisbah. For there is no plaintiff and no defendant, but rather there is a public right that has been violated or there is a violation of the Shari’ah. Also, when the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) looked into the case of the heap of food, he was walking in the market at the time and the food was displayed for sale. He did not summon the vendor to him, but as soon as he detected the offence he dealt with it on the spot. This indicates that the cases of Hisbah do not require a judicial court.