支持这一观点的人包括Ash-Shaafi’iy和Al-Hanaabilah。大多数Fuqahaa’（法学家）则说：当穆斯林中的Mujtahideen（精通教法推导的学者）一致同意时，无论他们身处何方、来自何地、属于何种群体，只要某个现实问题呈现在他们面前，以便了解其Hukm Ash-Shar’iy（教法裁决），然后他们每一位都明确地以言语（Qawl）或行动（Fi’l）表达其对该裁决的意见，无论他们是聚集在一起还是各自独立进行，而且他们所有人的意见都一致指向对该现实的同一个Hukm，那么这就构成了一项Ijmaa’（公议）。他们所一致同意的这一Hukm，便是一项Hukm Shar’iy，遵从它是Waajib（必须的），反对它是不被允许的；同样，任何时代的其他人也不得违背它，因为它已经通过Ijmaa’得以确立。

The proponents of this opinion including Ash-Shaafi’iy and AlHanaabilah. The majority of Fuqahaa’ said: If or when the Mujtahideen of the Muslims have agreed irrespective of their different lands (locations), their places of origin and their groupings, in the case where a reality has been presented to them in order to know its Hukm Ash-Shar’iy and then each of them provides his opinion explicitly in respect to its Hukm, by Qawl (speech) or Fi’l (action), whether they did this collectively gathered or as individuals, and then all of their opinions had been in agreement upon a single Hukm in respect to that reality, then this represents an ‘Ijmaa’. This Hukm that they had agreed upon would then represent a Hum Shar’iy that is Waajib (obligatory) to follow and it is not permitted to oppose it just as it is not allowed for others in any time to contravene it because it has been established by Ijmaa’.