1 - 所谓“依据圣训的istihsaan”（Istihsaan As-Sunnah）和“依据公议的istihsaan”（Istihsaan Al-Ijmaa’），实际上并非istihsaan，它们只是反映了各证据之间的权衡取舍。例如，关于Khuzaimah的证言，很明显它体现的是圣训优先于类比（Qiyaas）。因此它属于各证据之间的权衡范畴，除名称之外，与istihsaan毫无关系。至于依据公议的istihsaan，它同样反映的是公议或圣训优先于类比（analogy）。由此，就制作（manufacturing）这一问题而言，很明显它体现的是圣门弟子的公议（Ijmaa’ As-Sahaabah）优先于类比，尽管制作本身是由圣训所证明的。那是因为真主的使者ﷺ命令制作一枚戒指和一座讲坛（Minbar）。因此，制作的裁定并非出自Al-Istihsaan。

1 - The Istihsaan As-Sunnah and Istihsaan Al-Ijmaa’ in reality are not Istihsaan but rather they only reflect the outweighing of evidences. So for instance in regards to the testimony of Khuzaimah then it is evident that it represents the outweighing of the Hadeeth over the Qiyaas. It therefore falls within the remit of outweighing between evidences whilst it has no relationship to Istihsaan except in name. As for Istihsaan Al-Ijmaa’ then this also reflects the outweighing of the Ijmaa’ or the Sunnah over Qiyaas (analogy). Consequently, in respect to the subject of manufacturing it is evident that it represents the outweighing of the Ijmaa’ As-Sahaabah even though manufacturing is proven by the Sunnah. That is because the Messenger of Allah (saw) ordered the manufacturing of a ring and a Minbar. Therefore (the ruling of) manufacturing does not come from Al-Istihsaan.