不允许发生"纳斯赫"（Naskh，废止）的范围 - 《Al-Waadih Fee Usool ul-Fiqh》 | Quran Course

不允许发生"纳斯赫"（Naskh，废止）的范围 - 《Al-Waadih Fee Usool ul-Fiqh》 | Quran Course

逊奈（Sunnah）与经文的启示（Aayaat）并不相同，也不优于《古兰经》，更不与之等同。另有经证明确传述，欧麦尔·本·哈塔卜（ra）曾说："我们不会为了一个我们不知道她是否说实话的女人的话，而舍弃安拉的经典和我们先知的逊奈。"

The Sunnah is not the same as the Aayaat and it is not better than the Qur’aan or like it. It has also been soundly reported from ‘Umar Ibn Al-Khattaab (ra) that he said: “We do not leave the Kitaab of Allah and the Sunnah of our Nabi for the statement of a women whom we don’t know whether she has told the truth or lied”.

3 – 不允许以“khabar al-aahaad”（孤证传闻）废除“al-Sunnah al-Mutawaatirah”（众所周知的圣训传统）。

3 – It is not permissible to abrogate the Sunnah Al-Mutawaatirah by the Khabar Al-Aahaad.

因为逊奈·穆塔瓦提尔（Sunnah Al-Mutawaatirah）是确定可靠的（Qat’iy Ath-Thuboot），而圣训·阿哈德（Khabar Al-Aahaad）是或然可靠的（Zhanniy Ath-Thuboot），而或然的不能废止确定的，因为确定的高于它。

This is because the Sunnah Al-Mutawaatirah is Qat’iy Ath-Thuboot whilst the Khabar Al-Aahaad is Zhanniy Ath-Thuboot and the Zhanniy cannot abrogate the Qat’iy because the Qat’iy is higher than it.

4 – 不允许废止一项源自“格亚斯”（类比推理）的判决（Hukm）。

4 – It is not permissible to abrogate a Hukm of Al-Qiyaas.

被认可（有效）的类比推理（Qiyaas），是指其“illah”（起因/理由）取自《古兰经》或《圣训》（Sunnah）的类比。

The Qiyaas (analogy) which is Mu’tabar (considered/valid) is the Qiyaas which its ‘Illah (reason) is from the Qur’aan or the Sunnah.

只要“原则”(Asl)存在,“类比”(Qiyaas)就存在;若“原则”被废止,则不存在“类比”。因此,“废止”(An-Naskh)根本不会发生在“类比”之中;在“原则”仍然存在的情况下,不可能设想“类比”被废止的情形,因为“律例”(Hukm)已存在于“原则”之中。

The Qiyaas remains as long as the Asl (origin) remains and if the Asl is abrogated then there is no Qiyaas. For this reason, An-Naskh (abrogation) does not occur in Al-Qiyaas at all and the occurrence of the abrogation of Qiyaas cannot been envisioned to happen whilst the Asl (origin) remains because the Hukm is present within the Asl.