Badan kehakiman Mazalim (Perbicaraan Kezaliman) tidak terikat dengan sesi mahkamah, permintaan pihak tertuduh, atau kehadiran pihak penuntut. Ia berhak meneliti mana-mana kes kezaliman walaupun tiada pihak penuntut.

The judiciary of the Injustice Acts (Madhalim) is not restricted by a court session or the request of the defendant or the presence of the plaintiff. It has the authority to look into any case of injustice even if there is no plaintiff.

Dalilnya ialah bukti yang mengesahkan bahawa syarat-syarat untuk sesi yang sah bagi meneliti sesuatu kes tidak terpakai kepada Mahkamah Kezaliman (Madhalim) kerana ketiadaan penuntut, memandangkan tiada keperluan untuk kehadiran penuntut, kerana mahkamah itu akan meneliti kezaliman (Madhlamah) walaupun tiada sesiapa yang menjadi penuntut. Begitu juga, tiada keperluan untuk defendan hadir, kerana mahkamah meneliti kes tanpa memerlukan defendan hadir, kerana ia meneliti dengan teliti kezaliman (Madhlamah) dan defendan. Oleh itu, dalil yang menjadikan sesi mahkamah sebagai syarat ialah sabda Rasulullah ﷺ.

Its proof is the evidence which confirms the conditions for the correct session to look into a case does not apply to the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) due to the absence of a plaintiff, since there is no requirement for the presence of a plaintiff, as it will look into the injustice (Madhlamah) even if no one was a plaintiff. Also, the lack of necessity for the defendant to be present, because the court looks into the case without requiring the defendant to be present since it is looking closely at the injustice (Madhlamah) and the defendant. Therefore, the evidence which makes the court session a condition - which is the words of the Messenger (pbuh).

.» أَنَّ الْخَصْمَ يْنِ يَ قْعُدَانِ بَ يْنَ يَدَيِ الْحَكَمِ « .

.» أَنَّ الْخَصْمَ يْنِ يَ قْعُدَانِ بَ يْنَ يَدَيِ الْحَكَمِ « .

"Dua orang yang berperkara duduk di hadapan hakim (di antara kedua tangannya)." diriwayatkan oleh Ahmad dan Abu Dawud daripada ‘Abd Allah bin Al-Zubayr, dan

“The two litigants sit in front of the judge (between his hands).” reported by Ahmad and Abu Dawud from ‘Abd Allah Bin Al-Zubayr, and.

.» إِذَا جَلَسَ إِلَيْكَ الْخَصْمَانِ « .

.» إِذَا جَلَسَ إِلَيْكَ الْخَصْمَانِ « .

"ketika dua pihak yang berselisih duduk di hadapan kamu" yang diriwayatkan oleh Ahmad daripada Ali (ra) - tidak terpakai. Berdasarkan itu, Mahkamah Kezaliman (Madhalim) boleh meneliti kezaliman (Madhlamah) semata-mata kerana ia berlaku, tanpa sebarang kekangan, sama ada disebabkan tempat, masa, sesi mahkamah, atau apa-apa lain.

“when the two litigants sit in front of you” reported by Ahmad from Ali (ra) - does not apply. Based upon that, the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) can look into the injustice (Madhlamah) simply due to it arising, without any restraint at all, neither due to location, time, nor court session, or anything else.

Namun, disebabkan kedudukan mahkamah ini dari sudut kuasanya, ia dahulu dikelilingi oleh sesuatu yang memberikannya imej yang megah dan agung. Pada zaman Sultan-Sultan di Mesir dan Asy-Syam, duduknya Sultan untuk meneliti kezaliman (Madhalim) dinamakan "Rumah Keadilan", dan salah seorang wakilnya akan mengendalikan sesi tersebut dengan dihadiri oleh para hakim dan ahli fiqh. Al-Maqrizi menyebut dalam kitabnya yang bertajuk "Al-Suluk Ila Ma'rifat Duwal Al-Muluk" (Jalan Untuk Mengetahui Keadaan Raja-Raja), bahawa Sultan Al-Malik Al-Salih Ayyub telah melantik wakil-wakil untuk bertindak bagi pihaknya di Rumah Keadilan. Mereka biasa duduk di situ untuk menghapuskan kezaliman (Madhalim), dan akan hadir saksi, hakim dan ahli fiqh semuanya. Tidak menjadi salah untuk menjadikan Mahkamah Kezaliman (Madhalim) sebuah bangunan yang indah dan megah, kerana ini termasuk dalam perkara yang diharuskan, terutamanya jika ia mencerminkan kekuatan keadilan.

However, due to the position of this court, from the angle of its powers, it used to be surrounded by what gave it an imposing and great image. In the time of the Sultans in Egypt and Ash-Sham the sitting of the Sultan during which the injustices (Madhalim) were looked into was called “The House of Justice”, and one of his delegates would undertake the session with judges and jurists present. Al-Maqrizi mentioned in his book entitled “Al-Suluk Ila Ma’rifat Duwal Al-Muluk” (The Way to Know the States of the Kings), that the Sultan Al-Malik Al-Salih Ayyub appointed deputies to act on his behalf in the House of Justice. They used to sit there to remove the injustices (Madhalim), and there would be witnesses, judges and jurists all present. There is no harm in making the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) a splendid building, for this would be from the permitted issues, especially if this reflected the might of justice.