Não há responsabilidade sobre aquilo que foi confiado em custódia (Ad-Daaruqutniy).
There Is No Liability Upon The Thing That Has Been Entrusted (Ad-Daaruqutniy).
Isto abrange e inclui todos aqueles que foram confiados, quer fosse um assalariado privado ou um assalariado público. Assim, abandonar o Daleel e depois julgar por meio do Istihsaan reflete um julgamento baseado no Hawaa (desejo ou capricho) e naquilo que a mente considera representar uma Maslahah (interesse).
This covers and includes everyone who has been entrusted whether he was a private hired hand or a public hired hand. As such abandoning the Daleel and then passing judgment by way of Istihsaan reflects passing judgment based on Hawaa (a desire of whim) and by what the mind has viewed to represent a Maslahah (interest).
A partir disso fica claro que o que se chamou de Istihsaan de Daroorah e Maslahah não representa um Daleel Shar'iy, mas sim o abandono do Daleel Ash-Shar'iy e a adoção daquilo que o 'Aql (intelecto) considera uma Maslahah ou Daroorah (necessidade).
From that it becomes clear that what has been called the Istihsaan of Daroorah and Maslahah does not represent a Daleel Shar’iy but rather it reflects the abandoning of the Daleel Ash-Shar’iy and adopting what the ‘Aql (mind) views to be a Maslahah or Daroorah (necessity).
Apesar disso, os ahkaam que os A’immah (Imames) que adotam o Istihsaan deduziram são considerados representativos dos Ahkaam Shar’iyah, porque esses Eruditos adotaram o Istihsaan por entenderem que ele representa um Daleel Shar’iy apoiado em um Shubhat Daleel.
Despite this, the Ahkaam that the A’immah (Imaams) who adopt Istihsaan have deduced are considered to be representative of Ahkaam Shar’iyah because those Scholars have adopted Istihsaan upon their consideration that it represents a Daleel Shar’iy reliant upon a Shubhat Daleel.