Los defensores de esta opinión, entre ellos Ash-Shaafi'iy y los Hanaabilah, [sic] — [the original has "AlHanaabilah"; keeping the name as written, adapted to Spanish usage as Al-Hanābila] — Al-Hanaabilah. La mayoría de los Fuqahaa' dijeron: Si o cuando los Mujtahidín de los musulmanes han acordado, sin importar sus diferentes tierras (ubicaciones), sus lugares de origen y sus agrupaciones, en el caso de que se les presente una realidad para conocer su Hukm Ash-Shar'iy, y luego cada uno de ellos expresa explícitamente su opinión respecto a su Hukm, mediante Qawl (palabra) o Fi'l (acción), ya sea que lo hayan hecho reunidos colectivamente o como individuos, y luego todas sus opiniones hubieran coincidido en un único Hukm respecto a esa realidad, entonces esto constituye un Ijmaa'. Este Hukm sobre el que hayan acordado representaría entonces un Hukm Shar'iy que es Waayib (obligatorio) de seguir, y no está permitido oponerse a él, del mismo modo que no le está permitido a nadie en ningún tiempo contravenirlo, porque ha sido establecido por Ijmaa'.

The proponents of this opinion including Ash-Shaafi’iy and AlHanaabilah. The majority of Fuqahaa’ said: If or when the Mujtahideen of the Muslims have agreed irrespective of their different lands (locations), their places of origin and their groupings, in the case where a reality has been presented to them in order to know its Hukm Ash-Shar’iy and then each of them provides his opinion explicitly in respect to its Hukm, by Qawl (speech) or Fi’l (action), whether they did this collectively gathered or as individuals, and then all of their opinions had been in agreement upon a single Hukm in respect to that reality, then this represents an ‘Ijmaa’. This Hukm that they had agreed upon would then represent a Hum Shar’iy that is Waajib (obligatory) to follow and it is not permitted to oppose it just as it is not allowed for others in any time to contravene it because it has been established by Ijmaa’.