No hay responsabilidad sobre aquello que ha sido confiado (Ad-Daaruqutniy).
There Is No Liability Upon The Thing That Has Been Entrusted (Ad-Daaruqutniy).
Esto abarca a todo aquel que ha sido confiado, ya sea un asalariado privado o un asalariado público. Por tanto, abandonar el Daleel y luego juzgar mediante el Istihsaan refleja emitir un juicio basado en el Hawaa (deseo o capricho) y en lo que la mente considera que representa una Maslahah (interés).
This covers and includes everyone who has been entrusted whether he was a private hired hand or a public hired hand. As such abandoning the Daleel and then passing judgment by way of Istihsaan reflects passing judgment based on Hawaa (a desire of whim) and by what the mind has viewed to represent a Maslahah (interest).
De ello se deduce que lo que se ha llamado Istihsaan de Daroorah y Maslahah no representa un Daleel Shar'iy, sino que refleja el abandono del Daleel Ash-Shar'iy y la adopción de lo que el 'Aql (la mente) considera una Maslahah o Daroorah (necesidad).
From that it becomes clear that what has been called the Istihsaan of Daroorah and Maslahah does not represent a Daleel Shar’iy but rather it reflects the abandoning of the Daleel Ash-Shar’iy and adopting what the ‘Aql (mind) views to be a Maslahah or Daroorah (necessity).
No obstante, los juicios (ahkām) que los imames (a'immah) que adoptan el istihsān han deducido se consideran representativos de los juicios legales (ahkām shar'iyyah), porque esos sabios han adoptado el istihsān por considerar que representa una prueba legal (dalīl shar'ī) apoyada en una prueba dudosa (shubhat dalīl).
Despite this, the Ahkaam that the A’immah (Imaams) who adopt Istihsaan have deduced are considered to be representative of Ahkaam Shar’iyah because those Scholars have adopted Istihsaan upon their consideration that it represents a Daleel Shar’iy reliant upon a Shubhat Daleel.