The Difference Between Al-iftaa’ (provision Of A Verdict) And Al-qadaa’ (judging)
The Iftaa’ is the Mufti informing of the Hukm Ash-Shar’iy for the issue being enquired about to the one enquiring about it. That is whether he adheres to this Hukm or does not adhere to it. He could inform him of this Hukm in Daar ul-Iftaa’ (the house of verdicts) as happens today or he could inform him of it in any other place.
That is whilst the Qadaa (judgment) is the informing of the Qaadi (judge) within the judiciary setting or session of the Hukm Ash-Shar’iy in a manner of compulsion for the purpose of applying this Hukm from the judge and upon the disputing parties or those who have committed violations, whether they are content with that Hukm (judgment) or not content with it. The Qadaa’ (judging) is not implemented or effective except in the judiciary session like within the court room for example.
Example related to the giving of the Fatwaa:
It was related from Ahmad Bin Hanbal (rh) that Al-Hussein Bin Bashaar asked him about a Mas’alah in relation to At-Talaaq (divorce) and then he said: If he does that then he has broken an oath. And so Al-Hussein replied to him: O slave of Allah, verily a person has given me a Fatwaa that if he did that he would not break his oath. So he (Ahmad) said: You know the Halaqah of the Madaniyeen, a Halaqah Bi Rasaafah. So he said: He gave me the verdict, indeed he made it Halaal. He said: Yes